WyoFile Energy Report

Wyoming lawmakers talk carbon cooperation in China summit

— June 9, 2014

TAIYUAN, CHINA —After a week of U.S. headlines simultaneously announcing declarations of war on coal and announcing a bold new beginning to addressing climate change, a delegation of Wyoming policymakers headed to coal producing regions of China. Their goal: to strengthen old international partnerships and build new ones centered on advancing technologies that reduce coal’s environmental footprint.

Dustin Bleizeffer
Dustin Bleizeffer

The delegation includes outgoing Wyoming Speaker of the House Tom Lubnau (R-Gillette), House Majority Whip Tim Stubson (R-Casper), House Minority Leader Mary Throne (D-Cheyenne), and Rep. John Freeman (D-Green River).

Also joining the delegation is Zunsheng “John” Jiao, chief geologist of the University of Wyoming’s Carbon Management Institute; Mark Newcomb, board of directors for the Jackson Hole Center for Global Affairs; Matthew Targett, vice president of research and development for LP Amina; Shi Zhenchun, president of Peabody China; David Wendt, president of the Jackson Hole Center for Global Affairs (JHCGA), and Olivia Meigs, director of communications for JHCGA — which organized this trip; and myself, WyoFile editor-in-chief.

This is my second energy/environment technology and policy tour in China. In 2009, I joined the “Sino-U.S. New Energy Sci-Tech Forum and Conference on Coal Mine Methane Recovery and Utilization”in Shanxi Province — also at the invitation of the JHCGA.

Wyoming coal tour in China
Outgoing Wyoming Speaker of the House Tom Lubnau (in the blue tie) speaks with an official of the Shanxi Provincial Peoples Congress at a banquet Monday in Taiyuan as part of a Wyoming coal tour in China. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile — click to enlarge)

So why China, and why now? Because coal is responsible for nearly 40 percent of man-made CO2 emissions, and because experts project that the world will continue to rely on coal as an abundant and cheap source of power to drive emerging economies. It’s no secret that the U.S. and China lead the world in man-made CO2 emissions, and that any success in avoiding the worst-case climate change scenarios relies on both countries to lead the way in cutting carbon emissions from coal — and soon.

In the months leading up to President Obama’s Clean Power Plan — which includes the first-ever carbon emission limit for new coal-fired power plants — Wyoming’s top elected officials expressed frustration over the media’s attention to climate change. Gov. Matt Mead (R) and House Speaker Lubnau both repeated the notion that it doesn’t matter if they personally doubt man’s role in climate change.

“It doesn’t matter what you think, if there’s anthropogenic — fill in the blank: climate change, global warming … Our markets change,” Lubnau told WyoFile earlier this month. “And if we want to continue utilizing coal we have to respond to the market.”

When Lubnau and the rest of the Wyoming delegation engaged in their first discussion of the week — with Shanxi Provincial Development and Reform Commission officials on the 8th floor of the Yingze Hotel — they learned that their Chinese counterparts are committed to cutting carbon from coal for much more than just coal market considerations.

Wyoming coal tour in China
Night life in Taiyuan in Shanxi Province. As one of China’s biggest producers and consumers of coal, Shanxi used to have four cities that made China’s top 10 most polluted cities. Today, all four of those cities have dropped off the list. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile — click to enlarge)

Wu Dongsheng, director of Shanxi Provincial Development and Reform Commission’s Climate Change Division, said that coal’s role in climate change is a driving force for a host of policies and initiatives already enacted in Shanxi — a coal-rich province that plays the same role in China as Wyoming plays in the United States’ coal energy system. Speaking through an interpreter, Dongsheng said it is Shanxi’s coal riches that obligate the province to lead the drive in cutting carbon emissions from coal. He briefed the delegation on Shanxi’s “commitment to the world” to reduce its total carbon emissions by 40-45 percent of 2005 levels by 2020 — a goal that the government has already made big strides toward.

Dongsheng explained that the carbon reduction goal is complemented by a host of energy policies that will boost the province’s GDP rather than be a drag on the economy, such as replacing antiquated industrial facilities with the newest energy-efficient designs, and deliberately bringing in new industries to shrink the provincial government’s reliance on coal-based revenues.

Dongsheng said the province is using the riches it’s reaped via its massive coal resource to build green energy initiatives.

Let me make clear that Shanxi officials didn’t ask about how Wyoming officials view climate change and man’s role in it. They did, however, enthusiastically offer to share their experiences in using a diverse set of policies and cooperative efforts to drive innovation in cleaning up coal. They are particularly interested in advancing carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology — something that U.S. coal mining and coal-reliant utilities have long despised as a federal regulatory approach at home.

Before Monday’s meeting with the Shanxi Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Rep. Mary Throne explained her frustration with the U.S. government’s current strategy to use regulation to drive CCS technology. “The Clean Air Act is not the right tool,” she said.

Wyoming coal tour in China
A view of Taiyuan, the capitol and largest city of Shanxi Province, China’s largest coal producing region. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile — click to enlarge)

In the current U.S. environment of flush domestic natural gas supplies, according to Throne, President Obama’s plan to reduce power plant emissions 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 will simply drive utilities to shift to natural gas, leaving the drive for coal-based CCS innovation languishing. A better, more innovation-friendly approach, according to Throne, might have been the “Waxman-Markey”carbon cap-and-trade bill, which passed the U.S. House in 2009, but was never considered by the U.S. Senate.

“That’s one of my frustrations with Wyoming’s congressional delegation,”said Throne, an attorney intimately familiar with air quality laws and regulations. “As a Wyoming legislator, I don’t get to rewrite the Clean Air Act.” She added that EPA “stepped into the void because Congress didn’t act.”

The Wyoming delegation’s China summit itinerary continues on Tuesday with a discussion and tour of laboratories at the Shanxi Coal and Chemical Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and a meeting with the Shanxi China Council for the Promotion of International Trade.

— Dustin Bleizeffer is WyoFile editor-in-chief. He has covered energy and natural resource issues in Wyoming for 15 years. You can reach him at (307) 267-3327 or email dustin@wyofile.com. Follow Dustin on Twitter at @DBleizeffer

If you enjoyed this column and would like to see more quality Wyoming journalism, please consider supporting WyoFile: a non-partisan, non-profit news organization dedicated to in-depth reporting on Wyoming’s people, places and policy.

REPUBLISH THIS COLUMN: For details on how you can republish this column or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy...

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. China already knows how to produce cheap low quality solar panels – which just about bankrupted the US solar industry.

  2. Wyoming may strive to sell 375 million tons of its sub-B coal every year, and use the atmosphere for a dump, but 25 percent of the Earth’s crust is made up of silicon. As in solar panel material…

  3. Closer to a sales trip would be more like it, how to produce solar panels would be a better endeavor,,,,