• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

WyoFile

Indepth News about Wyoming People, Places & Policy. Wyoming news.

  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Supporters
    • Membership
    • Underwriting
    • Foundations
  • COVID-19
  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Supporters
    • Membership
    • Underwriting
    • Foundations
  • COVID-19

Federal land transfer bills die in the House

Federal land transfer bills die in the House

The Wyoming House of Representatives on Friday failed to pass a bill to transfer federal lands to Wyoming and another bill seeking a catalog of closed routes on public federal property. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

February 12, 2016 by Dustin Bleizeffer 1 Comment

Tweet
Share
Pin
Email
0 Shares
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A bill to transfer federal lands to Wyoming and another seeking a catalog of closed routes on public federal property died in the Wyoming House.

HB 142 “Transfer of Federal Lands” wasn’t brought up for vote before the 3:45 p.m. deadline today. HB 126 “Public Land Access” to catalog the closed routes failed introduction 52-7-1.

Public Lands Access would have spent $100,000 to develop an inventory of federal roads and trails that have been closed. If passed, a committee could have recommended a bill to address public access. Opponents said that route information is readily available, and that Wyoming has already spent $75,000 on a study of transferring federal lands with a final report yet to come.

“I’ve got a publication with a phone number to the forest service and they’ll tell you every road that was closed,” said Rep. Stan Blake (D-Green River). “This is a budget crunch folks.”

Co-sponsor Rep. Dan Laursen (R-Powell) offered to revisit the $100,000 appropriation in the bill before it was defeated, but to no avail.

Several public lands access advocacy groups organized their memberships to contact Wyoming legislators to express opposition to it and other public lands transfer bills. Before HB 142 expired on Friday, the Wyoming Wildlife Federation said transferring public lands to the states, “would essentially put them on the fast track for energy and mineral development.” WWF Board President Dave Moody said “Without that federal ownership and designation, the states could do what they want when it comes to how these public lands could be managed, and this means decreasing their values when it comes to wildlife, habitat and recreation.”


Popular Articles:


Wyoming GOP embraces Trump’s phony voter fraud claims


New lawmaker’s tattoo has ties to far-right anti-government movement


Senate rejects three Gordon nominees to citizen oversight boards


Filed Under: Capitol Beat, Environment, Legislature 2016, Natural Resources, Politics

Dustin Bleizeffer

About Dustin Bleizeffer

Dustin Bleizeffer has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for 20 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy industry in Wyoming. Most recently he was Communications Director at the Wyoming Outdoor Council, a John S. Knight Journalism Fellow at Stanford, and WyoFile editor-in-chief. He lives in Casper. You can reach him at (307) 267-3327, [email protected] or follow him on Twitter @DBleizeffer.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. anne haverhals says

    February 24, 2016 at 8:17 pm

    Why did they waste our tax money on studying this? Most people in Wyoming know that the state is not who we want managing our public lands. They sell it to their buddies, they occassionally lease it excusively with a clause that allows the rancher to keep the public off of it, we can’t camp on it, we can’t have a camp fire on it…. If the state really wants to open up public land, they would have spent that money to purchase road easements for us to access our land locked land or a land locked fishing area. Thanks for the link for the petition regarding public access….why can’t the western republicans support the masses instead of the wealthy land owner who most likely can’t even vote in the state the politician represents?

    • City: rawlins
    • State of Residence: Wyoming
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules:
- Identify yourself with full name and city. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same.
- No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Tweets by @WyoFile

Search WyoFile

Become an Underwriter
Sign Up for Free Weekly Newsletters

Recent Comments

  • george wilten on Senate rejects three Gordon nominees to citizen oversight boards
  • Robert Nickens on Doctors, not talk-show hosts, should make public health decisions
  • Ricky Taylor on New lawmaker’s tattoo has ties to far-right anti-government movement
  • Mike Corder on Doctors, not talk-show hosts, should make public health decisions
  • Renée Carrier on Wyo leaders should focus on the facts in tackling budget crisis

Footer

Recent Posts By Date

March 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Feb    

From The Archives

  • About Us
  • People
  • Careers
  • Freelancing
  • Underwriting
  • How to Republish
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by WyoFile