• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

WyoFile

Indepth News about Wyoming People, Places & Policy. Wyoming news.

  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Supporters
    • Membership
    • Underwriting
    • Foundations
  • COVID-19
  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Supporters
    • Membership
    • Underwriting
    • Foundations
  • COVID-19

Newt Attacks the Courts

December 20, 2011 by The Sage Grouse 1 Comment

Tweet
Share
Pin
Email
0 Shares
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Sage Grouse

Newt Attacks the Courts

 

Newt Gingrich, former history professor and former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, understands the American three-part government of checks and balances.

This week he pretends not to.

RT Cox
RT Cox

Courts are not supposed to be popular. Judges are charged with making difficult decisions, including sentencing criminals, protecting civil rights and civil liberties, limiting the reach of the elected branches of the government and guarding the integrity of the jury trial system.

American courts have protected the rights of Nazis to march through Jewish communities, decisions not pleasing to many segments of society. Courts have ended racial segregation in schools, the workplace and the polling booth. The Supreme Court sealed the electoral victory for George W. Bush. (Thanks to Ralph Nader, who is thankfully turning his attention away from running for President after his last disaster.)

Courts are on the cutting edge. Law enforcement officers practically have to get a PhD in Constitutional law before hitting the streets and making arrests. My opinion is that sometimes the courts go too far in the name of protecting civil liberties, but that’s better than leaning too far in the other direction.

Courts, especially federal courts, are unpopular with evangelicals and conservatives because of Roe vs. Wade and related decisions.

When the election process proves too responsive to sudden changes in public opinion, laws can be passed which are oppressive to minorities. It is the function of the courts to protect minorities from vocal apparent majorities. (Because voter turnout is always affected by the emotions of the moment, what appears to be a majority one year may not be a majority at the next election.)

Courts exist to dampen the swings of the political pendulum. The Founders of the Constitution clearly intended that the courts would perform this function.

Newt, needing more traction with the Tea Party and allies, now is promising to haul judges before Congress to explain their decisions. Oops, there goes a climate for fair, unbiased, principled, reflective judgment. Let’s make a kangaroo court before politicized House committees at which to embarrass and attack judges. Or, let’s not.

Newt knows this will not happen, it cannot happen, and the Constitutional guarantees of separation of powers will make sure that this isn’t going to be. He is simply posturing. This is another throwaway idea to try to seize the passions of the moment before the Iowa caucus.

But think about this; promoting a dangerous, destabilizing and unconstitutional change in government structure, a massive change at that, may indicate a dangerous and destabilizing thought process in a man seeking the highest electoral office in the country.


Popular Articles:


Zinke review team calls for big changes to Obama era-plans


Ryan’s health care freedom promised bankruptcy


Trump’s brilliant strategy


Filed Under: The Sage Grouse

About The Sage Grouse

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Marc Ethier says

    December 20, 2011 at 3:31 am

    Here’s what else will not happen, cannot happen: Newt getting the nom. No sense wasting any more ink on him. It’s Mitt — always was gonna be.

      Reply

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules:
    - Identify yourself with full name and city. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same.
    - No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic.

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Primary Sidebar

    • Email
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • Twitter

    Tweets by @WyoFile

    Search WyoFile

    Become an Underwriter
    Sign Up for Free Weekly Newsletters

    Recent Comments

    • Dewey Vanderhoff on Week 45: The pandemic in Wyoming from Jan. 16-22
    • Matt Philpott on Cheney’s ‘vote of conscience’ deserves respect
    • Leslie Gura on State OK’s wind lease for 675-foot turbines near Laramie
    • Marcia Dunsmore on ‘Lightning Flowers’: Healthcare, survival and global supply chains
    • Donal O'Toole on It’s time to value and empower the women who run Wyo’s nonprofits

    Footer

    Recent Posts By Date

    January 2021
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
    « Dec    

    From The Archives

    • About Us
    • People
    • Careers
    • Freelancing
    • Underwriting
    • How to Republish
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2021 by WyoFile