A mule deer bounds away after being captured, measured and released near Superior. (Benjamin Kraushaar and Wyoming Migration Initiative) (Benjamin Kraushaar and Wyoming Migration Initiative)

The mule deer population in Wyoming has dropped 31 percent since 1991. Mule deer are a vital part of the Wyoming experience and economy for residents as well as tourists; the dramatic population decline should be a concern for everyone.

Unfortunately, in our divided times, the responses to the news are more ideological than scientific.

Several years ago Arthur Middleton, a wildlife biologist who has conducted research on ungulates in northwest Wyoming for many years, completed a study of the Clarks Fork elk herd in northwestern Wyoming and its declining numbers. He presented his findings at the Center of the West in Cody. Many viewpoints were represented in the audienceconservationists, hunters, anti-wolf people, etc.

Some predicted heated debate during the Q&A period. Professor Middleton generally said “it’s complicated,” noting the elk were facing not one but rather an array of challengeswolf predation, grizzly bear predation on newborn calves and climate change that has shortened the protein rich spring-summer grazing in Yellowstone. When he finished there was surprisingly little argument. We had all learned about both the complexity of these problems and the importance of science in addressing them.

The mule deer’s decline is also, most certainly, a complex problemincreased development sprawl, chronic wasting disease, and predation, to name but a few challenges. It would be all too easy for different groups to hunker down on their respective positions on the ideological continuum. Wouldn’t it be great if we could all put aside our normal divisions, get the best possible science, and work together to apply it?

We have more than a little of that science now, thanks to the work done by the University of Wyoming and the Wyoming Migration Initiative. Simply stated, one key to promoting healthy deer populations is protecting their migrations and their migration routes. Wyoming’s Office of State Lands and Investments recently deferred issuing drilling permits in the world famous Red Desert-to-Hoback migration corridor signaling its understanding of the importance to the deer.

Support informed commentary with a tax-deductible donation

Now the BLM is considering and granting leases for oil and gas wells in mule deer migration corridors including the Red Desert to Hoback. At a recent public forum, Wyoming Game and Fish Department leaders announced that they will have new scientific research within six months that will better capture the precise level of development that mule deer can tolerate in and around their migration routes.

The State of Wyoming, specifically the Wyoming Game and Fish, should request that the BLM delay issuing those particular permits until it receives and analyzes that research. The six-month delay is a small price to pay for the best information about how much development the deer can tolerate as they migrate and how much would be too much, compromising the deer migrations and further challenging the future of the mule deer in Wyoming.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *