• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

WyoFile

Indepth News about Wyoming People, Places & Policy. Wyoming news.

  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Support WyoFile
    • Membership
    • Publisher’s Circle
    • Institutional Supporters
    • Underwrite WyoFile
  • COVID-19
  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Support WyoFile
    • Membership
    • Publisher’s Circle
    • Institutional Supporters
    • Underwrite WyoFile
  • COVID-19

Two Elk Again?

September 28, 2010 by The Sage Grouse Leave a Comment

Tweet
Share
Pin
Email
0 Shares
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Speculators have struck gold (aka taxpayer gushing subsidies) again.  How do they pull this off over and over?

First, about a decade ago, the promoters of the proposed Two Elk power plant in southern Campbell County persuaded county and state officials to dedicate a huge portion of the state’s eligibility for tax exempt low interest revenue bonds totalling $445-million  to the project, which to meet federal requirements they dubbed a “solid waste recylcling and disposal facility.” (see earlier WyoFile story on this subject)

Next, the project received permits to construct from the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality.

Next, the owners got extensions of time on various bonds and permits.

Next, they built a highway to nowhere; this is apparently to be taken as evidence that this speculative venture might actually be built.  There is actually pavement out there, leading to sagebrush flats.

Meanwhile the project has no nearby market, no ready ability to transmit any power which it might generate and, despite the state’s largesse, is still struggling to find financing.

Environmentalists can relax; this plant is not generating greenhouse gases, although its promoters are.

Many in Campbell County think it’s dead.  Unalterable Fact:  Public utilities, not promoters,  usually build power plants.

The University of Wyoming, with documented expertise and talented faculty, has received a federal stimulus grant of five million dollars to study feasibility of carbon sequestration in geologic formations.  Whoopee!!  Great news!!

But, I gasped as I read it, Two Elk ALSO received a five million dollar federal grant to study, it appears, the SAME THING!!   At the barren site where the power plant is NOT being built; in the absence of a power plant, it has been re-christened the Two Elk Energy Park.  Nothing like the smell of stimulus dollars in the morning.

One Brad Enzi, formerly of Gillette, serves as vice president of  Colorado-based North American Power Group, the Two Elk promoter/owner.  Hmm, does his last name rhyme with another famous name?

Contacted in Cheyenne, Enzi-the-son denied that the Two Elk Power Plant is a failed project. Enzi said his employer, North American Power Group, is still working on “bulk financing” to make the power plant happen. He said that North American Power Group has even applied to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality for a permit to burn bio mass from beetle kill trees in the plant should it ever be built.

Enzi said the sequestration study, which he said covers a larger area of the Powder River Basin than just the Two Elk site, is not a federal liferaft thrown to the much-delayed power plant.

“The Two Elk Energy Park sequestration project ,” said Enzi, “is separate from the Two elk power plant.  By working with researchers from Stanford University and the Montana university system, we hope to gain a better understanding of the underground storage potential of the entire region through this sequestration project. Although work continues to make the  make the Two Elk plant happen, it is entirely seperate from the sequestration project.”

Meanwhile, taxpayers, the Two Elk Energy Park, a figment of some promoters’ imagination, about as much an energy experiment station as my back yard, is getting just under $5 million in stimulus money to massage words into attractive investment schemes.

Read this junk:  http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0001997.pdf.


Popular Articles:


Enzi economic development hire draws criticism, defenders


Two Elk fraudster Michael J. Ruffatto locked up


Two Elk: The story behind the story


Filed Under: The Sage Grouse, Two Elk

About The Sage Grouse

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules:
- Identify yourself with full name and city. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same.
- No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Tweets by @WyoFile

Search WyoFile

Become an Underwriter
Sign Up for Free Weekly Newsletters

Recent Comments

  • Harvey Reading on Proposed project would trap, move, track lamb-hunting eagles
  • leslie patten on Proposed project would trap, move, track lamb-hunting eagles
  • Harvey Reading on Cheney rails against plans to withdraw troops from Afghanistan
  • John Rinehart on Proposed project would trap, move, track lamb-hunting eagles
  • Mike Dunbar on Cheney rails against plans to withdraw troops from Afghanistan

Footer

Recent Posts By Date

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Mar    

From The Archives

  • About Us
  • Careers
  • How to Republish
  • Freelancing
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by WyoFile