• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Subscribe
  • Donate

WyoFile

Indepth News about Wyoming People, Places & Policy. Wyoming news.

  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Supporters
    • Membership
    • Underwriting
    • Foundations
  • COVID-19
  • Latest News
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Legislature
    • Native America
    • Natural Resources
    • People
    • Photo Friday
    • Places
    • Policy
  • Voices
    • Drake’s Take
    • Madden’s Measure
    • Guest Column
    • Studio Wyoming Review
  • Supporters
    • Membership
    • Underwriting
    • Foundations
  • COVID-19

Voters oppose using defense bill to stop grouse plans — poll

Voters oppose using defense bill to stop grouse plans — poll

Results of a recent poll indicate that western voters reject a House Republican argument that federal sage grouse conservation efforts threaten national security. (courtesy Mark Gocke)

June 7, 2016 by Environment & Energy News 1 Comment

Tweet
Share
Pin
Email
0 Shares
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By Ariel Wittenberg, E&E reporter

A majority of Western voters from states with federal conservation plans for the greater sage grouse object to using an annual defense bill to stymie the effort, according to a survey released last week by a nonpartisan veterans group.

Sixty-three percent of voters in Wyoming, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington support federal sage grouse conservation plans in their states, and 69 percent say the annual defense authorization bill is an inappropriate means of stopping implementation.

“A strong majority of Westerners — including military men and women, veterans, and their families — have once again made it clear that they do not want to see years of Western stakeholders’ hard work derailed,” said Garett Reppenhagen, Rocky Mountain director of the Vet Voice Foundation, which sponsored the poll. “Congress needs to respect our men and women in uniform and stop insulting the nation’s intelligence by pretending that sage-grouse conservation is a threat to our security.”

RELATED | 5 ways Wyoming helped prevent sage grouse ESA listing

This is the second year House Republicans have sought to use the defense authorization act to weaken sage grouse conservation. Last year, lawmakers attempted to delay an endangered species designation for the bird by 10 years. [Rep. Cynthia Lummis backed that effort as chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus.] That language is in the House version of the bill again, along with another provision allowing states to override federal conservation plans.

The Senate version of the bill being debated on the floor this week does not contain a provision on the sage grouse.

Opposition to grouse provisions crosses party lines and military experience, according to the poll of 500 registered voters with a margin of error of 4.4 points. The poll was conducted by Harper Polling for the Vet Voice Foundation.

Seventy percent of those without a military connection and 66 percent of voters who either served or are related to someone who did oppose the legislative tactic. Sixty-one percent of Republicans, 80 percent of Democrats and 67 percent of independents also object to the maneuver.

Vet Voice has strongly opposed the sage grouse language in the defense bill. Last week, it launched an advertising campaign against the policy rider (Greenwire, May 24).

SUPPORT: If you enjoyed this story produced by Environment & Energy, please consider supporting WyoFile. WyoFile pays a subscription fee to E&E for the right to bring E&E stories to our readers.
— Originally published by Environment & Energy Daily. Contact E&E publishing for permission to republish.


Popular Articles:


Invasive zebra mussels land in Wyo via aquarium moss


Game and Fish eyes backups should courts shut elk feedgrounds


Wyo scientists study interplay of wildfire smoke and climate change


Filed Under: Environment, Natural Resources

About Environment & Energy News

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Nadine Girouard says

    June 9, 2016 at 10:07 am

    Our so called “leaders”, which we voted in, have turned their backs on us, the people, who want clean air, clean water, and hopefully, this election cycle will get them ALL OUT. I know I am NOT voting for one single incumbent, period.

    • City: Rock Springs
    • State of Residence: Wyoming
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Want to join the discussion? Fantastic, here are the ground rules:
- Identify yourself with full name and city. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish and expects commenters to do the same.
- No personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats. Keep it clean, civil and on topic.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Tweets by @WyoFile

Search WyoFile

Become an Underwriter
Sign Up for Free Weekly Newsletters

Recent Comments

  • george wilten on Senate rejects three Gordon nominees to citizen oversight boards
  • Robert Nickens on Doctors, not talk-show hosts, should make public health decisions
  • Ricky Taylor on New lawmaker’s tattoo has ties to far-right anti-government movement
  • Mike Corder on Doctors, not talk-show hosts, should make public health decisions
  • Renée Carrier on Wyo leaders should focus on the facts in tackling budget crisis

Footer

Recent Posts By Date

March 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Feb    

From The Archives

  • About Us
  • People
  • Careers
  • Freelancing
  • Underwriting
  • How to Republish
  • Subscribe
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2021 by WyoFile