Employee vehicles fill a parking lot at Belle Ayr mine in August 2016. Blackjewel LLC, which ran the mines, declared bankruptcy July 1 and sent nearly 600 miners home. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)

As a week of budget amending wrapped up Friday, the House and Senate took opposite positions on a $500,000 appropriation to help the next round of laid-off coal miners or other workers. 

The Senate-approved amendment would earmark the funds for the Department of Workforce Services to spend supporting workers subject to a mass layoff. The amendment defines a mass layoff as when an employer with 50 or more workers lays half of them off. 

When workers suddenly lose a paycheck, the account will “put food on the table and make sure they can get medicine,” said Senate Majority Leader Ogden Driskill (R-Devils Tower), who sponsored the Senate amendment. Such a safety net is one of the “basic premises of our society,” Driskill said.

The Senate voted 22-8 to adopt the measure. 

The House, meanwhile, twice voted narrowly against including the amendment. The amendment failed 26-30 on its first attempt. It failed 27-30 on its second, according to sponsor House Minority Floor Leader Cathy Connolly (D-Laramie). 

Concerns in the lower chamber focused on the parameters of eligibility to use the fund, which were deemed too broad. Some House opponents said the definition of a catastrophic layoff was too inclusive.

Sen. Ogden Driskill (R-Devils Tower)

Representatives from the two bodies will this week negotiate how to reconcile the different versions of the budget bill. The compromise they arrive at will subsequently require the approval of both the House and Senate. Spending increases that only found success in one chamber typically carry less clout in that process. 

In such cases the negotiators often compromise by seeking only half the funding amount, Driskill said. If that happens, $250,000 in funding for laid off workers would pass on to the governor. 

The amendment was “a start,” Driskill said, that the Legislature can subsequently build from. “At a reasonable cost, we make it where these people feel someone actually cares about them,” Driskill said. “We don’t just look at them as someone who pays us taxes.” 

The $500,000 figure had always been a starting point, Driskill said, for a problem that isn’t going away. Legislators did not yet know how much money the state would need to effectively cushion the blow of sudden layoffs, he said. 

In recent Wyoming history, significant layoffs have largely unfolded  in the energy industry. The prominent layoff of almost 600 Blackjewel employees in July 2019 has been on lawmakers’ minds all fall — sparking the creation of a special committee. 

Oil and gas contractor Haliburton also dealt regional economies bad news in 2019, when it laid off 650 workers across a number of states. Haliburton had a significant presence in Rock Springs and southwest Wyoming. 

Support legislative coverage with a tax-deductible donation

The Department of Workforce Services estimates 93 or more Wyoming workers were laid off by the oil and gas company. Those cutbacks didn’t have as acute an impact in Rock Springs as Blackjewel did in Gillette — Haliburton moved some employees to other areas, while other workers found jobs in trona mines — according to an official with the Sweetwater Economic Development Commission. 

Gordon mentioned Blackjewel’s collapse during his state-of-the-state speech to kick off the Legislative session. “While other states with Blackjewel operations vibrated ineffectively,” he said, “Wyoming sprang into action.” Indeed, in the days after the bankruptcy, state officials, including Gordon himself and several of his agency heads, rushed to Gillette to meet with the laid-off workers. 

Despite that show of force, Blackjewel miners spent the next four months out of work. In addition to not being paid, miners discovered Blackjewel had withheld retirement, health savings and tax dollars from their paychecks without depositing the money in the relative accounts.

House Minority Floor Leader Rep. Cathy Connolly (D-Laramie)

The governor’s office expressed support for the amendment Monday. “This amendment would enhance our ability to provide support in the event of future layoffs,” governor’s spokesperson Michael Pearlman wrote to WyoFile. “Additional resources to supplement DWS existing efforts are always welcome.”

In introducing her first attempt at passing the amendment, Connolly said a fund to help workers in more flexible ways than unemployment insurance is a tool other states have that Wyoming does not.  

As the Blackjewel layoffs showed, the state has other shortfalls. The Wyoming Department of Workforce Services found itself unable to conduct investigations into missing funds on behalf of Blackjewel miners who didn’t file claims with the agency. The vast majority of the miners did not file such claims, and DWS officials have suggested employees feared retaliation as they waited for a chance to return to work.  

Lawmakers are separately considering legislation to close some of those loopholes. 

Though it comes amid a blizzard of bills to prop up the state’s struggling coal, oil and gas industries, the money in the amendment is one of just a few legislative efforts to directly aid Wyoming workers hit by job losses. 

In contrast to the $500,000 — which could become $250,000 — lawmakers kicked off the session with at least $48 million in proposed spending for coal research, carbon capture projects and other efforts to create new markets and preserve existing markets for the coal industry.

Due to a publishing error, this story originally ran with the author listed as WyoFile managing editor Katie Klingsporn. —Ed.

Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *