An exterior view of the U.S. District Court in downtown Casper. (Photo: Nick Reynolds)

Nancy Freudenthal, U.S. District Judge for the District of Wyoming,  announced in June she will be assuming senior status, a phase of semi-retirement that will likely bring the judge to the final chapter of a lengthy and distinguished career in Wyoming.

The move — which will take effect next June — opens up a seat on the three-person district court for the first time since President Barack Obama appointed Freudenthal and Chief Justice Scott Skavdahl more than a decade ago.

District court judges are appointed for life, subject to Senate confirmation and responsible for the oversight of all federal jurisdiction cases in Wyoming, overseeing everything from civil to criminal cases. 

The President of the United States is responsible for choosing Freudenthal’s replacement. The current court consists of two judges appointed by Democrats and one Republican, an alignment that will persist once Freudenthal leaves the bench. 

Despite its red status, Wyoming has not had a judge appointed by a Republican since President Ronald Reagan nominated current justice Alan Bond Johnson in 1985.

“[Turnover] is not rapid, I would say,” said Casper attorney Mike Sullivan, who served two terms as Wyoming’s governor from 1987-1995. “That comes from the fact that it’s a good prestigious position, and you don’t have to run for it. It’s a lifetime appointment. That has a tendency to encourage people to stay in place.”

Filling the seat

Though President Joe Biden has the final say on who will fill that seat, the state’s top elected Democrats, and the party itself, are expected to play a big role in who is considered. 

During the Obama administration, that task fell to Gov. Dave Freudenthal, who recommended his wife. 

This time around, Wyoming finds itself in a unique situation. Though House Minority Leader Cathy Connolly and Senate Minority Leader Chris Rothfuss would appear to be the highest-ranking Democrats in Wyoming, the drafting of the president’s shortlist, according to the Democratic National Committee, falls in the hands of the Wyoming Democratic Party.

U.S. District Court Judge Nancy Freudenthal (Photo courtesy U.S. Government)

“We’re glad to help President Biden and his administration in any way we can as they seek an individual to nominate for this important position,” Wyoming Democratic Party Chairman Joe Barbuto said in a statement to WyoFile.

In the four prior judicial nominations in the state since Clarence Brimmer ascended to the position in 1975 (when Democrat Ed Herschler was governor), Wyoming’s governor has shared the party of the president. However, current Gov. Mark Gordon is a Republican, and the  Democratic Party holds little power in Wyoming, with no statewide elected officials and a small minority of the Legislature. 

The party is still not completely certain on the role it will assume in selecting Biden’s nominee.

That could make things interesting, the party’s communications director Nina Hebert said. Though all of Wyoming’s recent judges have been from Wyoming, Biden is under no legal obligation to install a judge from the state they are designated to serve. 

“When you have a governor that’s elected statewide, they just naturally have more sway [in the discussion],” said Hebert. “They have a bigger constituency.

“Even then, if a governor puts forward someone, puts forward a couple of names or puts forward even a single name, the president ultimately could still choose anyone that they wanted,” she said. 

Based upon qualification  

Historically, judicial nominations in Wyoming have not been controversial, Sullivan said. Many nominees gained Senate approval by unanimous or near-unanimous approval, according to a WyoFile review of confirmation votes. 

While Sullivan’s one nominee to the bench during his term, William Downes, faced some flak over a minor political scandal at the time, Downes was ultimately selected by then-President Bill Clinton and confirmed by the Senate.

Support independent reporting— donate to WyoFile today

“I don’t think it should be a contentious position, as far as politics is concerned,” said Sullivan. “It should be based upon qualification.”

It is unclear whether that will change under the Biden administration. At a 50-50 split, the Senate remains deadlocked, and is operating in the wake of President Donald Trump, who appointed 234 conservative federal judges during his tenure.

While early indications have shown bipartisan support for Biden’s two confirmed nominees to the bench this year, the total votes have been narrower than seen in recent decades. In each instance, both Wyoming U.S. Sens. John Barrasso and Cynthia Lummis voted against seating the nominee.

Lummis and Barrasso did not respond to requests for comment for this story.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. The trend will continue until fascism in this country is defeated, which will undoubtedly never happen in this sick country. We’re too far gone already.