Fences and plastic barriers remain around the Wyoming State Capitol as construction and restoration on the building continues. Elected officials who work in the Capitol are supposed to disclose potential conflicts of interest. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

Secretary of State Ed Murray, whose office oversees filings for new businesses in the state, is involved in 16 LLCs himself, all of which are registered to an office suite in Cheyenne.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jillian Balow is the only one of Wyoming’s five elected officials who does not claim any investment income, or hold office in any private business enterprise.

These are just two findings from the financial disclosure forms of state elected officials. These public documents are required of the five elected officials — Wyoming’s governor, state treasurer, secretary of state, superintendent of public instruction and state auditor — as well as all 90 legislators.

The documents are uploaded below and were obtained via a records request to the Wyoming Secretary of State’s office.

The most striking feature of the documents is how little they disclose. If legislators receive income from investments, real estate or royalties, they check a box, but there is no information about what those investments could be. “They’re not incredibly helpful to my knowledge,” Kai Schon, the election director for the Secretary of State, said of the forms.

Wyoming statute leaves it up to legislators and officials themselves to discern when they may have a conflict of interest.

“A member who has a personal or private interest in any measure or bill proposed or pending before the legislature shall disclose the fact to the house of which he is a member, and shall not vote thereon,” reads Article 3, Section 46 of the Wyoming State Constitution.

Wyoming has a citizen legislature. Many lawmakers and elected officials are business owners, ranchers or investment holders, and the financial disclosure forms exist to ensure any potential conflicts of interest are on the public record.

“That transparency is really important,” Balow said. After a career in public education and state government, her financials are much simpler than many others, she said.

But many of the forms do not seem thoroughly filled out. Some lawmakers listed being a legislator under the sections related to employment; others did not. Lawmakers receive a salary and a per diem reimbursement for lodging and travel while in session or at interim meetings.

On her financial disclosure form, Balow did not check two boxes asking whether investment income was earned from security or interest earnings, or real estate, leases or royalties. Though she failed to check the “no” box on the form, that would have been the correct answer, she said.

Sen. Affie Ellis (R, SD-8, Cheyenne) answered no to the question of whether she receives investment earnings. However, in an interview she said that along with her husband she has an investment company with a share of a Cheyenne steakhouse. She acknowledged a potential conflict of interest during the session, choosing not to vote on two bills that she said could have affected the restaurant’s liquor license.

State ranks poorly for electeds’ accountability

In 2015, the Center for Public Integrity ranked Wyoming 33rd of all states for legislative accountability, and 47th for accountability of the executive branch of government. The low rankings came in part from the fact that while elected officials are required to file financial disclosure forms, their family members are not. Wyoming’s score was also hurt because the forms, along with a lot of other public information, are not published online.

A further reduction in score came from the fact that financial disclosure forms are self-determined and are not independently audited.

This remains true today, according to Schon. There is no follow-up to ensure the financial disclosure forms are accurate, provided they’re turned in on time and appear complete.

“Our office is essentially a repository for these forms,” Schon said, “similar to campaign finance reports.” The onus for accuracy is on the legislator or elected official, he said.

There hasn’t been much interest in the forms. Schon said his office fields maybe one or two requests a year for copies. Balow said she rarely gets a call asking about her disclosure form.

Keep an eye out — subscribe to WyoFile’s free weekly newsletter.

The system being self-governed by the elected officials themselves is problematic, Sarah Gorin said. She’s a former director of the Equality State Policy Center, where she frequently focused on increased government transparency and accountability.

In a citizen legislature there are bound to be conflicts of interest, she said. “They do have conflicts, so they should declare them.”

In 1997, the Wyoming Attorney General’s office was asked to issue a public opinion on what type of interest represents a personal conflict for a legislator — the most recently available public opinion on the subject.

The office wrote that “conflicts of interest are typically subtle, and no one definition will always answer the question of whether a conflict exists.” Even when a specific conflict may not exist, the office warned lawmakers against creating the “appearance of impropriety.”

“The appearance of impropriety may in turn serve to undermine the public’s confidence in the integrity of the government,” the opinion read

Search the documents uploaded below for the form filed by your elected representatives, or search for one of the other five elected officials.

 



Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Thank you Wyofile for keeping the porch light shining on the fourth estate. Imagine the horror if you will, of a hypothetical world in which an elected official might feel justified in using the power of his editorship of a local publication to “purge” his own political interests of conflict (so to speak)…..and I say hypothetical simply because the voters in Weston County had the good judgement to finally “edit” this particular individual from his comfortable chairmanship in the last election cycle.

  2. How about “farmer/ranchers” that in fact derive their principle income from oil/gas royalties, leases, etc. or land value based on grazing leases for public land? I see nowhere on these forms to make those distinctions. (Nor on property taxes, either…)

  3. Owing to such a small inbred nepotistic population , everything in Wyoming is a conflict of interest . Except politics, which is an interest in conflict…