Wyoming lawmakers will give Medicaid expansion a hard look in the 2021 interim after two attempts to pass the measure failed in the Wyoming Senate in the recent session. 

The Legislature’s Management Council approved expansion as an interim topic Friday by a 7-4 vote. The Joint Revenue Committee will now take it up. 

Long a hot-button topic in Wyoming politics, Medicaid expansion saw renewed interest this session after the federal government passed legislation increasing the federal match.

The Management Council also approved studies on charter schools, a corporate income tax, election law, and education funding as it finalized its list of topics to be examined in the months between now and the 2022 session. Some controversial topics raised in the 2021 session, like the legalization of marijuana, were not raised as potential subjects for the interim session while others, like the potential transfer of federal lands to the state, were significantly pared down. 

Observers say the move of the Medicaid issue to the Revenue Committee, rather than the Senate Committee on Labor, Health and Human Services — where it was defeated this spring —  is a significant development for Medicaid expansion’s prospects. 

Unlike this year — when Medicaid expansion was introduced in the House as an individual, not committee sponsored, bill — the 2022 session will take place in a budget session, where individual bills require a two-thirds vote of the members just to be introduced. Committee bills lack that requirement, making legislation introduced in that type of session much more likely to be heard by the full Legislature.

Support independent reporting — donate to WyoFile today

But the Management Council was not united in its support. On Friday, Rep. Chuck Gray (R-Casper) questioned whether it is a good use of staff time and resources to rehash a measure that had failed to pass numerous times. Others, including Sen. Larry Hicks (R-Baggs), opposed hearing the bill in any committee other than Labor/Health.

Rep. Steve Harshman (R-Casper), a previous skeptic of expansion who changed his stance earlier this year, argued that Wyoming’s economy has changed. When change occurs, he said, the circumstances surrounding discussions on Medicaid expansion should reflect that.

Gray eventually made a motion to remove proposed studies on Medicaid expansion and a corporate income tax from the Revenue committee’s interim topics list. Both motions failed by a 7-4 vote.

Last week’s meeting of Management Council was the final, agenda-setting meeting for the group in its current configuration after the passage of House Bill 36 – Management council membership earlier this session. 

The traditionally non-partisan legislative committee sets the agendas, rules and protocols for the entire body.

The bill will reduce the total number of lawmakers on the Management Council. With the current Republican supermajority, it will only impact Democrats, who currently make up five of the council’s 13 members. The change, which will drop the minimum number of Democrats on the council from five to two, will take effect at the beginning of the 2022 legislative session.

“I appreciate this opportunity as long as I’ve got one,” Sen. Mike Gierau (D-Jackson) said Friday morning

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Trying to convince voters in the state that the legislature takes these important issues seriously during the legislatures interim might fool some of the people some of the time but eventually all of the people are going to catch on and the federal government will not be there to save them from the fiscal reality of declining revenues. The toes of legislators shoes must have holes worn in them by now given how often they have opted to kick the can down the road. Interim work is a thankless job and unappreciated by the legislature as a whole when the committee returns with real world solutions only to be ignored because it wasn’t the answer others were hoping for.

  2. The “study” has long been the method utilized by the Legislature to avoid any real action. Look for instance at the Worker’s Compensation system. Throughout the 1980s and 90s the Joint Interim Labor, Health and Social Services Committee would study the issue. Experts were hired, reports were penned, testimony was taken and when results came back that didn’t fit the committee’s preconceived solution, everything was shelved and another study was slated for the next interim.

    Everything the Legislature needed to know has been available to them for several sessions now. It is unlikely that any new information will be unearthed in one more study, this is just another way for Legislators to go through the motions of addressing the issue without having to actually do anything.