Salazar wants Wyo-style sage grouse management across the West

by Dustin Bleizeffer December 9, 2011September 22, 2021

Salazar wants Wyo-style sage grouse management across the West

At a press conference in Cheyenne today Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Wyoming’s “core areas” sage grouse habitat management plan could be applied across the West to protect the iconic bird. He said that in 2012 the largest wind energy project in the nation will be permitted in Wyoming — a feat only possibly because of the state’s pro-active efforts to protect sage grouse habitat.

“We need to be doing that across the 11 western states,” said Salazar.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has until 2015 to decide whether the greater sage grouse requires a full listing under the Endangered Species Act. If the bird is listed, it would devastate agriculture, energy, recreational and myriad other activities across much of the West, and would impact about 80 percent of Wyoming.

The joint news conference today between Salazar and Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead coincided with a meeting in Cheyenne of representatives from 11 western states. Mead said the goal is to form a cooperative strategy to avoid a sage grouse listing based on habitat conservation. “We also need to recognize that by doing a good job of protecting habitat for sage grouse, we’re also protecting habitat for 80 other species,” said Mead.

Salazar added that the health of the greater sage grouse is a litmus test for the health of the western lifestyle.

Also this week, the U.S. Bureau of Land Management announced it would begin the process of amending all of its Resource Management Plans across the West to improve protections for sage grouse. The announcement was welcome by some in the environmental community. But with praise for the BLM’s decision also came criticism that the BLM had been dragging its feet on the issue for years.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, center, and Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead, right, discuss strategies to conserve sage grouse habitat with representatives from 11 western states on Friday. (courtesy — click to enlarge)

“We are pleased that the BLM is finally recognizing that its standard operating procedures on sage grouse are failing, particularly with regard to oil and gas development,” Biodiversity Conservation Alliance wildlife biologist Erik Molvar said in a prepared statement. “The sage grouse plan amendments offer an opportunity not only to replace inadequate BLM protections, but also to close the loopholes in state Core Area policies that prevent them from protecting sage grouse in the face of industrial development.”

— Contact Dustin Bleizeffer at (307) 577-6069 or dustin@wyofile.com.

REPUBLISH THIS STORY: For details on how you can republish this story or other WyoFile content for free, click here.

Dustin Bleizeffer

Dustin Bleizeffer covers energy and climate at WyoFile. He has worked as a coal miner, an oilfield mechanic, and for more than 25 years as a statewide reporter and editor primarily covering the energy... More by Dustin Bleizeffer

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for:

Your real name — first and last.
Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
No more than three comments per story, including replies.

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
Comments that are not directly relevant to the article.
Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know:

Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement.
We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance.
Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you.