A sign greets a skeleton crew of Blackjewel employees who returned to work at the Belle Ayr mine. (Andrew Graham/WyoFile)

Blackjewel agreed to pay $793,847 in back wages on Tuesday after the U.S. Department of Labor filed a lawsuit against the bankrupt coal company in federal court. 

The federal agency filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court over unpaid wages on Monday, veering outside of bankruptcy court in an attempt to secure money the company owes its Wyoming miners. The company subsequently agreed to pay the back wages within 90 days of closing of the sale of the Eagle Butte and Belle Ayr mines, according to court documents. 

The lawsuit claimed that Blackjewel and affiliated companies violated federal labor laws by failing to pay workers wages and overtime pay. The lawsuit named around 500 Wyoming miners as affected, and leaves the door open for more to be added to the list.

The filing came as former Blackjewel workers are being asked back to work by Eagle Specialty Materials, the new operator of the Eagle Butte and Belle Ayr mines.

The lawsuit also came two weeks after bankruptcy filings revealed the federal government was investigating Blackjewel for potential violations of the False Claims Act, which deals with defrauding the federal government. In Monday’s lawsuit, the government accused Blackjewel of violating a different law, the Federal Labor Standards Act. 

The lawsuit asked for a judge’s injunction that would prevent the companies from escaping their payment obligations to the workers, even as a bankruptcy court in West Virginia continues to hear the case. Instead, U.S. District Court of Wyoming Judge Alan Johnson signed a settlement between the company and the government the following day. 

The lawsuit focused on a seven-day period just before the company filed for bankruptcy on July 1. During that period, the lawsuit said, “defendants failed to pay employees any wages for hours worked.” The Department of Labor claimed the Blackjewel workers were owed both regular and overtime pay. 

The suit was an effort to protect workers from losing wages to the bankruptcy proceedings, where well-secured lenders get first priority in divvying up a company’s assets, said Joshua Macey, a visiting assistant professor of law at Cornell University who studies bankruptcy law.

“It mean[t] it’s not just going to go away even if the bankruptcy is resolved,” Macey said of unpaid wages. WyoFile spoke with Macey before learning of the lawsuit’s settlement.

“It’s good that the Department of Labor is taking this seriously,” Macey said. “The federal government has a lot more tools at its disposal than state governments.”

The U.S. District Court of Wyoming in downtown Cheyenne. (Google street view)

Two employees of the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division referred WyoFile’s inquiries to the agency’s public affairs arm, which did not respond to questions by press time. 

An attorney for Blackjewel did not respond to a voicemail seeking comment by press time.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division sent investigators to former Blackjewel offices in Gillette to review payroll data, according to Kelly Roseberry, an administrator with the Labor Standards Division of the Wyoming Department of Workforce Services. Roseberry’s agency has been pursuing its own effort to get miners paid, but is only able to seek unpaid wages and benefits for workers who have made claims — 33 thus far, she told WyoFile. 

The filing of the lawsuit in a federal court indicated investigators believe Blackjewel was not paying its workers for reasons unrelated to those that led to bankruptcy, Macey said. A lawsuit could have implicated executives like former Blackjewel CEO Jeffrey Hoops.

“If the [U.S.] Department of Labor [could] show in a court proceeding that Blackjewel willfully didn’t pay its employees, it can go after a lot of people,” Macey said, “and possibly even Hoops directly.” 

Another bankruptcy scholar suggested the federal government might have stepped outside bankruptcy court to secure a judgement that the company had violated the Federal Labor Standards Act. “Every instance of violation of the law you want a record of it because you get down the line and it becomes evidence for a future case,” said Michael Duff, a University of Wyoming law professor. 

In Gillette, Blackjewel under Hoops had a reputation for failing to pay bills to local contractors and vendors even before details began to emerge in a bankruptcy filing that the company had shorted its workers on 401(k) retirement deposits and, ultimately, wages. Local businesses have subsequently filed claims in the bankruptcy court for tens of thousands of dollars. 

Last week, Roseberry told Wyoming lawmakers on the new Select Committee on Coal/Mineral Bankruptcies that the U.S. Department of Labor had found Blackjewel owed 506 Wyoming miners an estimated $816,000 in lost wages. Roseberry at the time said she believed that number may be low, as her initial investigation of just 27 workers turned up $140,000 owed.

Support WyoFile with a tax-deductible donation today.

That accrued through overtime wages, unpaid overtime and deductions for 401k retirement accounts and health savings accounts that were taken from workers paychecks and never deposited. Extrapolated to more than 500 workers, the total sum would be much greater than $816,000. 

The U.S. Department of Labor, however, focused in the lawsuit only on unpaid wages, not benefits.

The deal for Eagle Specialty Materials to buy the mines included $1.8 million the company agreed to put aside for workers who went unpaid or lost out on wages and benefits. The $1.8 million will also go toward health expenses idle employees incurred in the months since the bankruptcy filing that Blackjewel has not covered. The company cancelled health insurance for idle employees at the end of August, with court approval.

Read the settlement between Blackjewel and the U.S. Department of Labor:



Judgement (Text)

Andrew Graham covers criminal justice for WyoFile.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *